New Film - 'Son of God'

[Les Brewer]

Just learn't that there is a brand new film tiled 'Son of God'. As anyone had the chance to see this?

Here is the trailer to this new film



Also if you would like to visit the official website then follow this link......... Son Of God Movie Official Web Site

[Les Brewer]

Looking at the trailer it looks looks like they have made this film using the footage from the 'Bible The Mini Series'. Its great to see that opportunity's have been taken to get the message out there...

[Les Brewer]

Ray Ritchie shares his views on this new film

Son of God the Movie:

For biblical accuracy I would have to give it a barely passing grade.
For chronological accuracy again I would have to give it a barely passing grade.
For entertainment from a serious point of view the movie was done well and kept your attention, it pulled at the strings of your heart as the acts of love and betrayal were played out before your eyes, the more accurate part of the was the trial of Jesus, his flogging, and crucifixion.

The story is suppose to be told from the point of view of John’s Gospel, he is telling the story from exile on the Isle of Patmos which is where John wrote the Revelation of Jesus Christ, which is written some 10 or more years after the gospel of John. The Gospel of John was one of the reason’s John was on the Isle of Patmos.

There were many areas in the film where Jesus half spoke a scripture which for me took away from the word of God, we have also one Pharisee who seemed to be everywhere Jesus went, and the movie gives Nicodemus a role which the scriptures do not verify.

The movie is put together with the hopes of waking people up to the reality of the life and death of Jesus Christ and is not sublime when it comes to his divinity, and that he is the way, the truth, and the life. It would be a great tool to show someone who is searching for God, but not a great tool to teach them the veracity of the scriptures.

[Les Brewer]

Is Blockbuster 'Son of God' Film Biblical?

Ben Kayser/Movieguide shares his views on this new Film
'Son of God'
'Son of God' (Courtesy of Movieguide)

When the movie Son of God surpassed expectations and earned $26.5 million on its first weekend, it was once again clear that the Christian community has power over the box office.

Not surprisingly, non-Christian skeptics criticized the movie, but they weren’t alone in some of their criticism.

Many Christians, for various reasons, have issues with how the Bible was adapted for screen in Son of God. They rightly compare what is shown in the movie to the Holy Scriptures and point out where the movie has deviated. This is beneficial, for Acts 17:11 calls us to be like the Bereans, searching out the Scriptures to find out what is true. No Christian wants to see the Savior misrepresented on screen.

Sadly, however, some Christians are accusing a valid representation of Christ in Son of God and claiming it represents a false gospel. This isn’t true. Instead of addressing each and every difference between Son of God and the Bible, I’d like to make a few points in defense of Son of God and the many Bible movies that are to come.

While the Bible must be held in the highest regard and treated with the utmost respect, we should never treat any rendition or adaptation of the Bible on par with God's revealed Word. Son of God is meant to point people to the Bible, not replace it.

Mark Burnett and Roma Downey, who developed The Bible television miniseries and Son of God, have been outspoken about their faith and love for Jesus. Marketing material for The Bible encouraged people to explore Scripture, and the Son of God website is full of resources to help walk people through the movie from a biblical worldview.

No on-screen version of the Bible ever has or ever will represent the life of Jesus 100 percent. Creative choices will and should be made to make a movie as good and as compelling as it can be. One can question whether certain choices are good, and even Movieguide has pointed out several missing components that would have strengthened the movie in our review of Son Of God. The most important thing to remember is that the movie does present a proper Christology.

Movieguide’s founder and publisher, Ted Baehr, listed nine crucial components needed in a orthodox Christology. In his full article that can be read here, he writes:

“An orthodox Christology requires at least:

“A real ontology (which means that reality is real, not just a great thought or something else).

“A real epistemology (which means that a person can really know that reality is real).

“A real soteriology (which means that Jesus really saved us).


advertisement
“A real resurrection.

“A real divinity (Jesus Christ is “very God of very God,” which is how the Council of Nicea resolved the Homoousian conflict that Jesus was of the same essence, or substance, as God the Father, and so there is only one God).

“A real incarnational theology (Jesus Christ was “fully God and fully Man,” which resolves the Gnostic and Arian heresies that Jesus was only one or the other).

“A real history (Jesus Christ’s death and resurrection were actual events in history; thus, they are more than historical, but not less than historical).

“A real morality (Jesus died once for the sins of all).

“A real victory (Jesus Christ’s death was not a defeat but a triumph).”

While the Gospel of Mark may omit details that the Gospel of Luke describes fully, the Gospel of Mark isn’t any less the gospel or Good News. Also, the Gospel of John offers a completely unique perspective of Jesus that the other three gospels don’t have, including many wonderful, vivid descriptions and even metaphors of who Jesus really is and what He represents.

Similarly, the many movies based on Jesus Christ are important because they can each focus on one aspect, attribute or perspective of Christ, but only if God is represented as He should be.

Before calling Son Of God “anemic” or “false hope” as some Christians have, be gracious enough to consider whether or not you’ve misinterpreted the images on the screen. Calling something heresy is a serious claim. See if your “evidences” are extrabiblical or antibiblical, and most of all, see what kind of fruit is being produced from the movie or TV show. God’s sacrifice as shown on screen in Son Of God is moving people to Scripture, where they are finding true salvation.

Movieguide has received numerous stories of lives that have been changed by Jesus movies like Son of God, The Passion of the Christ, Cecil B. DeMille’s 1927 silent movie King of Kings, and many more adaptations. Let’s be careful that we aren’t hindering the gospel in the name of a narrow definition of truth.

The words of Jesus in the New Testament are not like an audio recording on Memorex. They are a literary description of historical events. No filmmaker, pastor or evangelist is perfect, yet God still uses us, in our imperfections, to share His glorious truth and magnificent love to a hurting world.

Ben Kayser is managing editor at Movieguide.

[clarkthompson]

I liked the movie it is clear they did not do everything exactly the way the bible ad it but did not anything away from the truth of the gospel, someone can see this movie and have known all they need to be saved if the faith is given to them.

[Deleted]

I have not seen it yet but will probably buy it when it comes out. Looks good, if it is anything like the Bible mini series it should be great.

[arete]

I'll be skipping it. It seems that some of the artistic license gravitates toward a new gnosticism.

thefederalist.com/2014/03/10/son-of-god-veers-toward-gnostic-heresy/

Quote from the linked article

On scale, Downey and Burnett made a series of interpretive decisions in their portrayal of Judas that mitigate his culpability for Jesus’ death: they offered an explanation for his willingness to betray Jesus that is not found in the gospels (his concern that Jesus’ appearance in Jerusalem would lead to a riot); they chose the gospel account that has Jesus tell him to “do it quickly,” rather than one that emphasized the predictive aspect of Jesus’ comments; when it comes to Gethsemane, they abjured the gospel account that quotes Jesus as asking Judas’ if he’ll really “betray the Son of Man with a kiss” in favor of one that allows them to show Jesus once again telling Judas to follow through with the planned betrayal.

When Joel Osteen praises Downey and Burnett’s portrayal of the Last Supper, he says that the scene shows Jesus’ grace to the disciples would fall away from him. “He still took up for them, he forgave them, he believed the best in them,” Osteen says.

It appears that Burnett and Downey want to believe the best about Judas. They do a good job of communicating the political unrest of Jerusalem in the time of Pontius Pilate, which makes for a dramatic story of Jesus’ ministry and provides a cause for Judas’ contact with Jesus’ enemies.